Five Football Players Charged by English FA
-
Related Posts
-
InterCasin Welcome New Year with £125 FREE
2 January 2010
-
Two days to the hit rabbet Jackpot - Casinos online
1 January 2010
-
The Top 5 Online Casino Items of 2009
31 December 2009
-
Casino Tropez Launches TV Games
30 December 2009
-
Starting to play Blackjack online
29 December 2009
-
Jackpot Hero blow the wonder twice in one day in an online casino
28 December 2009
-
Antigua Sets Stricter eGaming Protocols
18 May 2009
-
Things Heat Up at French Casino Market
17 May 2009
-
Jadestone’s Prospects Looking Good This Year
15 May 2009
-
European Poker Tour Comes to a Close
9 May 2009
English Football Association Uncovers a Dirty Little Secret Regarding Football Sport Betting
England’s Football Association charged five of its professional soccer players on the grounds of sport betting regarding the outcome of a match that they have a “direct influence” on.
The charges were placed on Accrington Stanley players during the Coca-Cola League Two last May 3, 2008, in which the visiting team, Bury, won two goals against none. They all placed bets on Bury. The players charged were Jay Harris, Robert Williams, David Mannix, and Peter Cavanagh from Accrington Stanley, and Andrew Mangan for Bury. Last month, another player, Leighton McGivern, was also charged for failure to give information to the FA regarding the accusation.
As a rule, FA prohibits this kind of sport betting in which the participant has a direct influence on the outcome of the game. Both Cavanagh and Harris have played in the said game.
The values they gambled were high, even comparable to the prizes won in playing a game of online roulette in an online casino. Mannix bet £4,000, Mangan £3,500, Harris £2,000, Williams £1,000, and Cavanagh on a five-pound accumulator.
Harris is also facing more charges involving sport betting. It has something to do with his new club and two other League Two fixtures. This is likewise for Cavanagh, who gambled on other League Two matches even if he had a direct influence over the game’s outcomes.
The same can be said true for online gaming in casinos. One is not allowed to play a casino game, say online blackjack, if he has an influence over the results.





